West Virginia Contractors License Practice Exam 2025 – All-in-One Resource for Exam Success!

Disputes in construction contracts are typically resolved through arbitration or mediation because these methods provide a structured, yet flexible, approach to conflict resolution. Both arbitration and mediation are alternatives to traditional litigation, which can be time-consuming and costly.

Arbitration involves a neutral third party who hears both sides of the dispute and makes a binding decision. This process is usually faster and more private than going to court, which can be beneficial for all parties involved. Mediation, on the other hand, involves a mediator who facilitates negotiations between the parties to help them reach a mutually agreeable solution. This process encourages communication and collaboration, which can lead to more satisfactory outcomes and help preserve professional relationships.

These alternative dispute resolution methods are particularly valued in the construction industry, where timing and ongoing relationships are crucial to project success. In contrast, the other options tend to be less preferred due to their drawbacks; court trials can be lengthy and adversarial, third-party inspectors might not be equipped to resolve disputes comprehensively, and informal discussions may lack the structure necessary for effective resolution.